The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a writ petition concerning data entry operators by relying on a coordinate bench order in Gopiram Gurjar & Ors., directing the State to decide representations within specified timeframes.
Disposed by analogy with Gopiram Gurjar; directed petitioners to ventilate grievances for State consideration within ten weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2007/2021
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Prajapat. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
05/02/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is identical to S.B Civil Writ Petition No.10695/2018 (Gopiram Gurjar & Ors. Vs. State of
(2 of 2)
[CW-2007/2021]
Rajasthan & Ors.), decided on 16.05.2018 and that similar relief be granted to the petitioners also.
In the case of Gopiram Gurjar (supra), a Coordinate Bench of
this Court observed as under:-
“It is further contended that for the present; the petitioners would be satisfied, if the State respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioners, within a time frame, in the light of the adjudication in the case of Mukesh Kumar Khatik (supra), which they are ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.
In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioners to address a comprehensive ventilating the grievances raised in the writ application.
In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than ten weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.
With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed of.”
In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of in light of and with similar directions as given in the case of Gopiram Gurjar (supra).
The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
42-Sumit/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gopiram Gurjar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶17
S.B Civil Writ Petition No.10695/2018 (Gopiram Gurjar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.)
Suresh Kumar Damor
Mahendra Singh Rathore
State Of Rajasthan
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
