Single bench order heard numerous writ petitions seeking industrial plots. Court disposed of cases as infructuous where allotment was already made, otherwise adjourned to permit challenge to prior committee orders.
Petitions disposed of as infructuous where allotment made; otherwise listed for future hearings to challenge prior orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2826/2013
Sanwal Ram
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Raj. And Ors
----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 921/2011 Parasmal ----Petitioner Versus State Of Raj. And Ors. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11443/2011 Mohd. Imran ----Petitioner Versus State Collector Barmer And Ors ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11534/2011 Sona Ram ----Petitioner Versus State Collector Barmer And Ors ----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13162/2012
M/s. Mohd. Yunush Dyeing Works
----Petitioner Versus
State Of Raj. And Ors
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13163/2012
M/s. Mayur Madhavi Mills
(2 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Raj. And Ors
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13164/2012
Niraj Kumar
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Raj. And Ors
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2825/2013
Sanwal Ram S/o Mishri Lal
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Raj. And Ors
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8824/2013
Maha Bajrang Processors
----Petitioner
Versus
Riico And Anr
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9310/2013
Fareed
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1736/2014
M/s Tak Textiles Through Its Properitor Imran S/o Shri Shabir, Main Bazar, Balotra Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment
(3 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
Corporation Ltd. Riico, Through
Its Managing Director, Udyog
Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
2. The Regional Manager,
Rajasthan State Industrial
Development And Investment
Corporation Limited Riico, Kher
Road, Industrial Area, Balotra,
Dist. Barmer.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2060/2014
M/s Arafat Textiles
----Petitioner
Versus
Riico And Anr.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2583/2014
Ismile Khan
----Petitioner
Versus
Riico And Anr.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2584/2014
M/s Raj. Textiles
----Petitioner
Versus
Riico And Anr.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2593/2014
M/s. Kishore Das Jamna Das,
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2594/2014
Sanwal Ram
(4 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6887/2015
Mohan Lal Mandot
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2389/2016 M/s. Mangal Laxmi Processing Balotra ----Petitioner
M/s. Mangal Laxmi Processing Balotra
Versus ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2392/2016
State And Ors
M/s. Mansuri Finishing, Balotra
----Petitioner
Versus State And Ors ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2393/2016 M/s. Mukesh Anand Product
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2437/2016
M/s. Mahesh Devendra Dying
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
(5 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2439/2016
M/s. Mahiman Dying Company
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3024/2016
Harish Peding Works
----Petitioner Versus ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3025/2016
State And Ors
M/s. Maha Dadiji Industries
State And Ors
----Petitioner Versus ----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3848/2016
M/s. Kadri Textiles
State And Ors
----Petitioner Versus ----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6258/2016
M/s. Magan Dyeing
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7972/2016
M/s. Ramdhan Cotton Mills
----Petitioner
Versus
(6 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
State And Anr
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7976/2016
M/s. Ramdhan Industries
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Anr
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7977/2016
M/s. M.p. Dhupai Udhyog
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Anr
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8337/2016
M/s Maha Ruchi Washing
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Anr.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15331/2017
M/s Arafat Textiles, Balotra, District Barmer Through Manager, Imran S/o Shri Shabir, Resident Of Main Bazar, Balotra Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus 1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited Riico, Through Its Manag, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
(7 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15340/2017
M/s Tak Textiles, Through Its Proprietor Imran S/o Shri Shabir, Resident Of Main Bazar, Balotra Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus 1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited Riico, Through Its Manag, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. 2. The Senior Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited Riico, Kher Road, Industrial Area, Balotra, District Barmer ----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15443/2017
Ismile Khan S/o Shri Barkat Khan Chhipa, Resident Of Lalji Ka Than, Balotra, District Barmer Proprietor Of M/s M. Janata Textile, Jerla Road, Balotra.
----Petitioner
| 1. | Versus Rajasthan State Development And |
Industrial Investment |
|---|---|---|
| Corporation Limit | ed Riico, | |
| Through Its Man Bhawan, Tilak Marg, |
ag, Udyog Jaipur. |
|
| 2. | The Senior Region | al Manager, |
| Rajasthan State | Industrial | |
| Development And | Investment | |
| Corporation Limited | Riico, Kher | |
| Road, Industrial Ar | ea, Balotra, | |
| District Barmer. |
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15444/2017
M/s Rajasthan Textiles Through Proprietor Shri Alta Ahmed S/o Noor Mohammed, Resident Of Sadar Bazar, Khatriyon Ka Chowk,
(8 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
Balotra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Rajasthan State | Industrial |
| Development And | Investment | |
| Corporation Limit | ed Riico, | |
| Through Its Man | ag, Udyog | |
| Bhawan, Tilak Marg, | Jaipur. | |
| 2. | The Senior Region | al Manager, |
| Rajasthan State Development And |
Industrial Investment |
|
| Corporation Limited | Riico, Kher | |
| Road, Industrial Ar | ea, Balotra, | |
| District Barmer |
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15600/2017
Radheyshyam Textile Through Proprietor Santosh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Nathu Lal Sharma, By Cast - Brahmin, R/o Mohini Niwas, Near Old Bus Stand, Balotra, District - Barmer, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
| 1. | Versus Rajasthan State |
Industrial |
|---|---|---|
| Development And Corporation Limi Through Its Man Bhawan, Tilak M Rajasthan. |
Investment ted Riico, ag, Udhyog arg, Jaipur, |
|
| 2. | The Regional |
Manager, |
| Rajasthan State | Industrial | |
| Development And | Investment | |
| Corporation Limi | ted Riico, | |
| Industrial Area, Bal - Barmer. |
otra, District |
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16181/2017
Hem India Mills, Balotra Through Its Proprietor Babu Lal, S/o Bhima Ram Mali, Resident Of Agrawal Colony, Ward No. 3, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
(9 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
Versus
1.
2.
Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment, Corporation Limited Riico, Through Its Managing Director, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited Rii, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16899/2017
M/s Shree Process Through Its Proprietor Smt Sita Devi W/o Sh. Jai Prakash Goyal, Resident Of Ward No. 3, Agarwal Colony, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The District Collector, Barmer Raj. 2. The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited Riico, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 526/2018
M/s Saraf Dying Company, Through Its Partner Jugal Kishore Saraf S/o. Rajaram Ji, Agarwal Colony, Behind Adarsh Vidhya Mandir, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The District Collector, Barmer Raj. 2. The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial
(10 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
Development And Investment Corporation Limited Riico, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 528/2018
M/s Ramniwas Textiles, Through Its Proprietor Ramkishore S/o. Ram Gopal Singh, R/o. Baldev Ji Ki Pole, Ward No. 9, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The District Collector, Barmer Raj. 2. The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited Riico, Balotra, District Barmer. ----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 590/2018
M/s Ramanuj Industries Through Its Proprietor Shrawan Kumar S/o. Pukhraj, Having Its Office At Near Third Railway Crossing, Regarpura, Kundan Pura, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
| 1. | Versus Rajasthan State |
Industrial |
|---|---|---|
| Development And | Investment | |
| Corporation Limi | ted Riico, | |
| Through Its Mana | g, Udhyog | |
| Bhawan, Tilak Marg | , Jaipur. | |
| 2. | The Regional |
Manager, |
| Rajasthan State | Industrial | |
| Development And | Investment | |
| Corporation Limi | ted Riico, | |
| Balotra, District Bar | mer. |
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 628/2018
M/s. Manju Processing House, Through Its Proprietor Manju Devi W/o. Satyanaraya, Having Its Office At Near Third Railway
(11 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
Crossing, Regarpura, Kundan Pura, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus 1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited Riico, Through Its Manag, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. 2. The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited Riico, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1735/2018
M/s Mohd. Khawaja Dying Company, Through Its Proprietor Jamaludeen S/o. Mangu Deen, R/o. Near Lal Ji Ka Than, Ward No. 17, Balotra Raj. Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1740/2018
M/s Parasram Fabrics, Through Its Proprietor Nand Kishore S/o. Shri Rameshwar Lal, By Caste Agarwal, R/o. Agarwal Colony, Near Agarsen School, Balotra, Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
(12 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
Development And Investment Corporation Limited Riico, Through Its Manag, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. 2. The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial And Invetment Corporation Limited Riico, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7272/2018
Madina Textile Through Its Proprietor Mohd. Ayub S/o Shri Mohd. Habib, Resident Of Near Madina Masjid, Ward No. 17, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
| Versus | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Rajasthan State Development And Corporation Riic Through Its Manag Udhyog Bhawan, Jaipur |
Ind Inve o Li ing Di Tilak |
ustrial stment mited, rector, Marg, |
| 2. | The Regional |
Ma | nager, |
| Rajasthan State | Ind | ustrial | |
| Development And Corporation Lim Balotra, District Bar |
Inve ited mer. |
stment Rii, |
|
| 3. | The District Col | lector | Cum |
| Allotment Committ | ee, Ba | rmer. | |
| ---- | Respo | ndents |
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7275/2018
Jilani Dyeing Company Through Its Proprietor Mohd. Hussain S/o Shri Mohd. Habib, Resident Of Near Madina Masjid, Ward No. 17, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
| Versus | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Rajasthan | State | Industrial |
| Developmen | t And | Investment | |
| Corporation | Limi | ted Riico, | |
| Through Its | Managi | ng Director, |
(13 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
Udhyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur 2. The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited Rii, Balotra, District Barmer. 3. The District Collector Cum Allotment Committee, Barmer.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11201/2018
M/s Mohd. Sayed Dying Company, Through Its Proprietor Bundu Khan S/o, Usman, By Caste Musalmaan, Having Its Office At Harizan Basti Ward No. 22, Balotra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
| 1. | Versus Rajasthan State Development And Corporation Limit Through Its Manag Udyog Bhawan, Jaipur |
Industrial Investment ed, (Riico), ing Director, Tilak Marg, |
|---|---|---|
| 2. | The Regional Rajasthan State |
Manager, Industrial |
| Development And Corporation Limit Balotra, District Bar ---- |
Investment ed (Riico), mer. Respondents |
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12023/2018
Maha Arihant Finishing, Through Its Proprietor Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Mishri Mal Aged About 42 Years, Rabariyon Ka Tanka No. 1, Balotra, Dist. Barmer
----Petitioner
Versus
(14 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
Jaipur.
2.
The Regional Manager, Rajathan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico), Balotra, Dist. Barmer.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12092/2018
Maha Sagar Chemical, Through Its Proprietor Hastimal S/o Shri Sagarmal, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 4, Regarpura, Dhanji I Dhani, Balotra, District Barmer (Raj.)
----Petitioner
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Rajasthan State Development And Corporation Limit Through Its Manag Udyog Bhawan, Jaipur. |
Industrial Investment ed (Riico), ing Director, Tilak Marg, |
| 2. | The Regional |
Manager, |
| Rajasthan State | Industrial | |
| Development And | Investment | |
| Corporation Limit Balotra, District Bar |
ed (Riico), mer. |
|
| 3. | The District Col | lector Cum |
| Allotment Committ | ee, Barmer. | |
| ---- | Respondents |
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12118/2018
Krishna Dyeing Company, Through Its Proprietor Gautam Chand Jain S/o Mishri Mal Jain Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Jerla Road, Ward No. 15, Balotra, District Barmer (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
(15 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
Udhyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. 2. The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico), Balotra District Barmer. 3. The District Collector Cum Allotment Committee, Barmer.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12136/2018
Maharani Dyeing Company, Through Its Proprietor Bhagwana Ram S/o Shri Tulchha Ram, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Mahadev Colony, Ward No. 22, Balotra, District Barmer (Raj.)
----Petitioner
| 1. | Versus Rajasthan State Development And Corporation Limit Through Its Manag Udyog Bhawan, Jaipur. |
Industrial Investment ed (Riico), ing Director, Tilak Marg, |
|---|---|---|
| 2. | The Regional Rajasthan State |
Manager, Industrial |
| Development And | Investment | |
| Corporation Limit Balotra, District Bar |
ed (Riico), mer. |
|
| 3. | The District Col | lector Cum |
| Allotment Committ ---- |
ee, Barmer. Respondents |
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17397/2018
Madras Finishing Works, Proprietor Sakina Banu W/o Shri Vali Mohd., Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Third Crossing, Regarpura, Balotra, District Barmer (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
(16 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
Through Its Managing Director, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17409/2018
Faird Mohd Dyeing, Proprietor Hinifa Wd/o Shri Farid Mohd, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Panghat Road, Balotra Through Her Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Imran S/o Shri Sabirji, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Sadar Bazar, Balotra, District Barmer (Raj.).
----Petitioner
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17411/2018
Reliance Dhulai Works, Through Its Proprietor Om Prakash S/o Shri Mishri Mal Mali, R/o Gandhipura, Balotra, District Barmer
(17 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
(Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19149/2018
M/s. Lala Ram Kana Ram, Having Its Office At Opposite Roop Ji Ka Bera, Near Shamshan Ghat, Balotra, District Barmer, Through Its Power Of Attorney Holder Mohd. Imran S/o Mohd. Sabir, Age About 34 Years, R/o Nagina Masjid, Chatriyo Ka Morcha Panghat Road, Balotra.
----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico), Through Its Managing Director, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. 2. The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico), Balotra, District Barmer. ----Respondents
(18 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8804/2013
Surya Texcom
----Petitioner
Versus
RIICO And Ors
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6286/2013
M. Dilip Kumar
----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico). and Anr.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4156/2013
Hirani Textile Mills, Balotra
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico). and Anr.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6287/2013
National Century Mills
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico). and Anr.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10936/2013
Rajat Sales Agency
(19 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico). and Anr.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3620/2013
Himalaya Products India, Balotra
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico). and anr.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4611/2013
Padmawati Process, Balotra
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico). and Ors
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Pram Dayal Bohra Mr. Hemant Ballani Mr. BS Sandhu Mr. Devkinandan Vyas for Mr. Rajesh Parihar Mr. VD Gaur Mr. Narendra Singh |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sanjeet Purohit Ms. Manisha Purohit for Mr. MS Purohit |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
13/12/2021
(20 of 23) [CW-2826/2013]
In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2826/2013, 6258/2016, 7972/2016, 7976/2016, 7977/2016, 16181/2017, 16899/2017, 526/2018, 528/2018, 590/2018, 628/2018, 1735/2018, 3024/2016, 3025/2016, 8824/2013, 3848/2016, 8804/2013, 6286/2013, 4156/2013, 6287/2013 & 10936/2013:-
The matter pertains to the Industrial Plots to be allotted by the respondents in accordance with law.
At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent Mr. Sanjeet Purohit submits that in all the aforesaid writ petitions, the conclusive order has been passed by the Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner on dated 13.05.2017 deciding the claim of allotment of industrial plots.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case, any of the petitioner is adversely affected by the order of the Committee dated 13.05.2017, then it would be appropriate to permit them to take their separate remedies. It is further contended that without challenging the rejection order dated 13.05.2017, their right cannot be adjudicated.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have good case on merits but however, they are unable to refute the fact that the order of the Committee dated 13.05.2017 is not under challenge.
Learned counsel for petitioners also submits that they would have definitely challenged it, but it was not conveyed properly to the present petitioners and thus, the delay in taking appropriate remedy may be condoned and a fresh opportunity be given.
In light of the aforesaid submissions, the present petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to take up their individual cases by challenging the order dated 13.05.2017, if so advised.
(21 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
Stay application as well as all pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.
In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15331/2017, 15340/2017, 15443/2017, 15444/2017, 15600/2017, 1740/2018, 7272/2018, 7275/2018, 3620/2013 & 4611/2013:-
List on 11.01.2022, as prayed.
In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1736/2014, 2060/2014, 2583/2014, 2584/2014 & 2593/2014:-
The matter pertains to the Industrial Plots to be allotted by
the respondents in accordance with law.
At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent Mr. Sanjeet Purohit submits that in all the aforesaid writ petitions, the conclusive order has been passed by the competent committee headed by the Industrial Minister on dated 08.06.2017 deciding the claim of allotment of industrial plots.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case, any of the petitioner is adversely affected by the order dated 08.06.2017, then it would be appropriate to permit them to take their separate remedies. It is further contended that without challenging the rejection order dated 08.06.2017, their right cannot be adjudicated.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have good case on merits but however, they are unable to refute the fact that the order dated 08.06.2017 is not under challenge.
Learned counsel for petitioners also submits that they would have definitely challenged it, but it was not conveyed properly to
(22 of 23)
[CW-2826/2013]
the present petitioners and thus, the delay in taking appropriate
remedy may be condoned and a fresh opportunity be given.
In light of the aforesaid submissions, the present petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to take up their individual cases by challenging the order dated 08.06.2017, if so advised.
Stay application as well as all pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.
In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13163/2012 & 13164/2012:-
List on 11.01.2022, as prayed.
In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.921/2011, 11443/2011, 11534/2011, 13162/2012 & 6887/2015:-
List on 11.01.2022, as prayed.
In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9310/2013 & 2594/2014:-
List on 11.01.2022, as prayed.
In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2825/2013, 2389/2016, 2392/2016, 2393/2016, 2437/2016, 2439/2016 & 8337/2016:-
The matter pertains to the allotment of the Industrial Plots at Balotra.
At the outset, Mr. Sanjeet Purohit learned counsel for the RIICO submits that the industrial plots have already been allotted to the present petitioners vide order dated 13.05.2017, and the said decision was taken by the Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner.
(23 of 23) [CW-2826/2013]
In light of such submission made by learned counsel for the respondent-RIICO, the present petitions are disposed of as having become infructuous.
However, in case, any cause of action still survives, it shall be open for the petitioners to take all their appropriate recourse available in law.
Stay application as well as all pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.
In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11201/2018, 12023/2018, 12092/2018, 12118/2018, 12136/2018, 17397/2018, 17409/2018, 17411/2018 & 19149/2018 :-
List on 11.01.2022, as prayed.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
145 to 199 & C-1 to C-7/Sudheer//-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether writ petitions seeking industrial plots should be allowed despite pendency of an earlier committee order.
Whether delays in filing appeals against rejection orders can be condoned.
Whether petitions challenging industrial allotment become infructuous once allotment is made by a competent authority.
Sanwal Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Pushendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
