The High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of prosecution, noting that defects in the pleadings remained uncured for over two years, indicating the petitioner was not serious in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1705/2019
Smt. Beena Devi W/o Omprakash, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Choti Basti Pushkar Dist. Ajmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
(2 of 2)
[CW-1705/2019]
Dated 05.12.2007)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
18/08/2021
The defects have not been cured since 15.01.2019.
Taking into consideration that more than two years have lapsed and the defects have not been removed, it is apparent that the petitioner(s) is not serious in pursuing this case.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
saurabh/54
Smt. Beena Devi W/o Omprakash
Devi W/o Lumba
Mula S/o Lumba
Rama S/o Harji
Gopal S/o Harji
Smt. Kamla W/o Late Shri Laxman
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
