Disposed

Ramesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC28 Oct 2021CW/15314/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing respondents to sympathetically consider the petitioner's representation for posting at her husband's place based on government policy, ordering a speaking decision within three weeks if a fresh representation is filed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to consider petitioner's posting representation based on government policy; petitioner directed to file fresh representation and report within 3 weeks for speaking order.

Ramesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15314/2021

¶3

Ramesh Kumar S/o Richhapal, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted Girls Upper Primary School Rasal Tehsil Kuchaman City District Nagaur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner.

¶8

Joint Director, School Education Ajmer Division Ajmer.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla For Respondent(s) :

¶11

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶12

Order

¶13

28/10/2021

¶14

In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.

¶15

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to post the petitioner to place where her husband, who is in Government service is posted.

¶16

Various submissions have been made in the writ petition including submission that it is the policy of the State Government to post the husband and wife at the same station and at the place where the petitioner seeks transfer, there are vacant positions.

¶17

In view of the submissions, which have been made in the petition and the fact that the petitioner’s representation is already

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-15314/2021]

¶20

pending with the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to sympathetically consider the representation made by the petitioner based on the policy of the State Government.

¶21

The petitioner would be free to file a fresh representation along with the certified copy of the order instant. If such a fresh representation is made, the same may be considered by the respondents objectively and decided by a speaking order within a period of three weeks from the date a copy of this order along with writ petition / representation is placed before the respondents.

¶22

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶23

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶24

157-SKant/-

Ramesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Radha Kishan Sharma Vs Rajasthan Public Service Comm., Ajmer

Bina Paliwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shrawan Singh Vs Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur

Bhairav Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan