The petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1518/2020
Preetam Meena W/o Bhagesh Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Sukhanpura, Thesil Bamanwas, District Sawaimadhopur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. Rakesh Kumar Saini |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Ganesh Meena, AAG with Mr. Bhanu Sharma |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
10/03/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view thereof, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
NITIN /135
Preetam Meena
The State Of Rajasthan
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
