Dismissed

Bablesh Kumar Meena Son of Shri Dhanna Ram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Aug 2021CW/1325/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court bench dismissed a civil writ petition challenging eligibility conditions for School Lecturer posts. Citing a precedent, the court held that relaxation in qualification requirements is an executive domain and cannot be granted by the judiciary due to third-party rights, even if delayed by the pandemic.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; the writ petition was dismissed. The dismissal does not preclude petitioners from approaching the executive to take up the matter of pending applications.

Bablesh Kumar Meena Son of Shri Dhanna Ram Meena… — Education and Admissions | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

HIGH CWRT OF JUDICATURE FOR lU3ASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUW

¶3

S.B. Civil ~ht Petition No. 1325/2021

¶4

I. Bablesh Kumar Meena Son Of Shri .Dhanna Ram Meena, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Kishorpura, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.)

¶5

Vinod Kumar Verma Son Of Shri Pappu Ram Verma, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Chak, Tehsil Daritaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)

¶6

.::* .'*

¶7

Dharam inh:-aihwa+o$a&.l.rri Babu Lal Bairwa, Aged
, A. ' , . zr
n ,.
About 2.6 ?ears, Resident f.il'la&hahura, ,>% Post
a:-* \ .P $'
he maw as; p-.. Tehsil Lalsot, District ausax(,da) -
.i"+, v I%.&& &".
"1. t' ,,.$9*
, ,,+-a!. "Y qLT-$;etitioners
+';p.-r^ ,
Versus y &.2%> 5
*. .&
> '

¶8

I. Manoj Kumar i Nand Kishor, Aged And Post Deoli Kalan,

¶9

Tehsil Ramganjmandi, District Kota (Raj.)

¶10

Babu Lal Son Of Shri Javana Ram, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Near Bus Stand, Ratanga, Jayal, District Nagaur (~aj'.)

¶11

3. Pankaj Saini Son Of Shri Sultan Ram Saini, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 02, Virat, Nagar, District Jaipur (Raj.)

¶12

----Petitioners

¶13

Versus

¶14

I. State Of Rajasthan, Sanskrit Educaticn Department,

¶15

Through 1t's Principle Secretary, Govt. Secretariat, 1,aipur

¶16

Rajasthan Public Service Commissioner, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer (Raj.)

¶17

Dy. Secretary, Exam Rajasthan Public Service Commissioner, Ajmer (Raj.)

¶18

Director, Sanskrit Education, Shiksha Sankul, 3.l.n. Marg, Jaipur (Raj..)

¶19

----Respondents .

¶20

. . ".*- Ih --..
. k- &I a"--$ jj % **A $ ,a -.," A .>.
, 9-+ "A, y .&&& 2 ;.JT >$ & >:. - -
sm Koma 1 Ku G
For Petitio ner(s) For esondent'c~)g ....; ,- ,+vc'9%;gL . - p ,,,!w? , . Mr. S. Zakawat 'Y< A$ f /$G&-~ yy. -
yF..,iy $' $
?,. "., .i; Mr. Amit Lubhaya \ $i
- Jf A
K?&.
q&$wL +"
?.y
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE IMDEMEIEB SBNGM

¶21

10/08/:2021

¶22

~d mitied ly, t

¶23

.Degree after written e ducted for the post of

¶24

the School Lecturer.

¶25

Learned counsel lay in conducting the exa.mination and dec Degree was on account of already observed at the Principal Seatk~Jodhpur that although the test for -w-- wmym-"< ." :gd :&si . i I ~ecfurer was conducted on

¶26

04.08.2020. Since upto that date, petitioners did not possess the qualification, the petitioners cannot be allowed to be eligible,. .

¶27

In the case of Aditi Dadhich Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others,

¶28

SBCWP No.347/2021 decided by this court vide order dated 19.01.2.021, this court has held as under:4. The condition laid down in the advertisement is in accordance with the omnibus rule introd'uced in.

¶29

. State Subordinate Service Rules by the states Of

¶30

Rajasthan in the year, 1999 and this court finds that there is no provision for relaxation under the rules of such a condition. In view thereof, while it may be true that results of the qualifying examinations may . have been delayed on account of Pandemic, no relief can be granted to the petitiiner as third party rights would be created if the petitioner alone is granted such relaxtion. The domain for granting relaxation is exclusively with the executive and not no relief can be gi.bl.e as per the- ,W" advekishent ‘~3. L . f ri ,.& , * , ,';I 3 5.7~~' Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed-> The &" .>y /..<: P "A. ' $$$%srnissal of the writ petition would, howevegFnot, preclude the petiti taking up the matter

¶31

All pending applic

¶32

CHARU SON1 1117-118

Bablesh Kumar Meena Son of Shri Dhanna Ram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablesh Kumar Meena Son of Shri Dhanna Ram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sadam @ Mubariq Ali S/O Shamsher Ali B/C Muslim Vs State of Rajasthan

Sarika Sharma D/O Shri Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs Chairman, Rajasthan Sub-Ordinate and Ministerial Service Selection Board

Ruchika Kumari Daughter of Sh. Balbir Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Kalpana Sharma D/O Shri Hari Om Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Manoj Kumar Gochar Son of Shri Nand Kishor Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Chand Sharma S/O- Sh. Chitarmal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan