Allowed

Fhool Singh v. the Rajasthan State Road Trans. Corp.

Rajasthan HC6 Jan 2021CW/12592/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the writ petition relying on a prior judgment (Daulat Ram) concerning the reimbursement of retired employees' dues with interest. The order directs the corporation to pay dues within six months.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; Respondent corporation directed to reimburse entire dues of retired employees under all heads including retirement benefits, overtime, night allowance, and earned leave within six mo

Fhool Singh Vs the Rajasthan State Road… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12592/2020

¶3

Fhool Singh S/o Shri Nand Ram, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Village Seshu, Post Bishau, Tehsil Mandawa, District Jhunjhunu.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Rajasthan State Road Trans. Corp., Through Its Managing Director, Parivahan Marg (Headquarter), Jaipur.

¶7

The Executive Director (Engineer), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Head Office, Jaipur.

¶8

The Financial Advisor And Chief Accounts Officer, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Head Office, Jaipur.

¶9

The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Churu Depot, Churu.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Solanki (through VC) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit (through VC)

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

06/01/2021

Issue notice.

A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr. Suniel Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondentCorporation.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the dispute raised in the present writ petition has already been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-12592/2020]

¶20

No.9687/2015, decided on 1.10.2015 and, therefore, the present

¶21

writ petition may also be disposed of in light of the said judgment.

¶22

This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra) directed as under :-

¶23

“In this background, these writ petitions deserves to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to be concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest.

¶24

No order as to costs.”

¶25

In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in the

¶26

light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same directions as quoted hereinbefore.

¶27

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶28

33-Rmathur/-

Fhool Singh v. the Rajasthan State Road Trans. Corp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fhool Singh v. the Rajasthan State Road Trans. Corp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Makan Lal Mochi Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Singh Bhari Vs State of Rajasthan

Rishikesh Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Nain Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

National Highway Authority of India Vs M/S P.L.L.- P.C.L. Jv

Narendra Sen Vs State of Rajasthan