Remanded

Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan through P P

Rajasthan HC23 Nov 2021CRLR/603/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Uma Shanker Vyas allowed the S.B. Criminal Revision Petition, quashing the previous interim order in the medical negligence case by correcting a violation of Section 7 of the Rajasthan Revision Code and recalling the Lower Court for fresh disposal.

What did the court decide?

The Appeal was set aside and remanded back to the Lower Court for fresh disposal after a proper inquiry into the facts.

Mohan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan through P P — Medical Negligence | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 603/2017

¶3

Mohan Lal S/o Shri Rampal, R/o Thawala Tehsil Riyan Badi, District Nagour.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pyare Lal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

23/11/2021

¶12

1- v/khuLFk U;k;ky; fof”k’B U;k;k/kh'k] ls”ku

¶13

U;k;ky; ¼Hkz’Vkpkj fuokj.k] vf/kfu;e½ vtesj }kjk vfHk;ksx la[;k 27@2016 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 8-2-2017 ] ftlds rgr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ;kph&vfHk;qDr ¼ftls vkxs vfHk;qDr dgk tk,xk½ ds fo:) /kkjk 7 Hkz’Vkpkj fuokj.k vf/kfu;e ,oa /kkjk 120&ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds rgr vkjksi fojfpr fd;k x;k gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk is'k dh x;h gSA

¶14

2- fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls fuxjkuh ;kfpdk esa fy;s x;s rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq;s dFku fd;k gS fd vfHk;qDr eksguyky ds ikl ifjoknh dk dksbZ dke ugha Fkk] dfFkr fodz; foys[k dk iath;u fnukad 18-06-2014 dks gksus ds ckn fnukad 24-06-2014 dks d`f’k Hkwfe dk ukekUrj.k Hkh gks pqdk FkkA vr% fnukad 26-06-2014 dks dksbZ dke vfHk;qDr ds ikl yfEcr

¶15

(2 of 3) [CRLR-603/2017]

¶16

ugha FkkA ekax lR;kiu dh dfFkr dk;Zokgh rFkk vuqla/kku }s’krkiw.kZ gS] vkjksi fojfpr djus ckcr i=koyh ij dksbZ lkexzh ugha gS] vr% vk{ksfir vkns”k fof/k ds izko/kkuksa ds izfrdwy gS] tks vikLr gksdj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶17

3- fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vk{ksfir vkns”k dks rF;ksa o lk{; ds vuq:i gksuk crkrs gq;s bl LVst ij lk{; dk ckjhdh ls fo”ys’k.k o foospu vuqer% ugha gksuk crk;kA

¶18

4- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dh ryc”kqnk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA bl LVst ij lk{; dk vR;Ur lw{erk ls fo”ys’k.k o foospu vuqer% ugha gSA ;g Hkh ugha ns[kuk gS fd vfHk;qDr dh nks’kflf) gksxh ;k ugha] cfYd ek= ;g ns[kuk gS fd vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ,df=r lkezxh ds vuqlkj vkjksi fojfpr djus gsrq i;kZIr lkexzh gS vFkok ugha \

¶19

5- gLrxr izdj.k esa fodz; foys[k fnukad 18-06-2014 dks iathd`r gksuk vfHkys[k ls Li’V gS] iVokjh ds c;ku ls ;g Li’V gS fd fodz; foys[k dh izfr ifjoknh ukuwjke ds }kjk miyC/k djokbZ xbZ] ftlds vk/kkj ij fnukad 24-06-2014 dks ukekUrj.k [kksyk tk pqdk Fkk] mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds ckotwn ;g Li’V gS fd vly fodz; i= mi&iath;d dk;kZy; xPNhiqjk } kjk ifjoknh ukuwjke dks miyC/k ugha djok;k x;k rFkk bl gsrq fnukad 26-06-2014 dks mi&iath;d ¼uk;c rglhynkj xPNhiqjk½ }kjk eksguyky }kjk vius jhMj o ujlhjke ds ek/;e ls 7]000@&#i;s dh ekax dh xbZ] ftldh f”kdk;r ifjoknh }kjk Hkz’Vkpkj fujks/kd C;wjks] ukxkSj dks dh xbZ] ftl ij mlh fnu fj”or dh jkf”k dh ekax dk lR;kiu djok;k x;k] ftldk VªkalfdzI”ku i=koyh ij miyC/k gS] ftlesa Hkh ifjoknh] vfHk;qDr eksguyky] mi&iath;d rFkk mlds jhMj okrkZyki ys[kc) gSA

¶20

(3 of 3) [CRLR-603/2017]

¶21

iathd`r fodz; foys[k dks ykSVkus gsrq oS/k jkf”k ds vykok vU; jkf”k dh ekax fj”or ds :i esa dh tkuk izdV gks jgk gSA vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ;g Hkh Li’V gS fd tks fodz; foys[k fnukad 18-06-2014 dks iathc) gqvk Fkk] og vly fodz; foys[k ifjoknh dks lqiqnZ ugha fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj mlh ds fy, vuqfpr jkf”k dh ekax vU; yksxksa ds ek/;e ls dh tk jgh Fkh] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vfHk;qDr ds ikl rr~le; ifjoknh dk dke yfEcr FkkA

¶22

6- ,slh fLFkfr esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk mijksDr lEiw.kZ lkexzh ij fopkj djus ds mijkUr vk{ksfir vkns”k ikfjr dj ;kph@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) /kkjk 7 Hkz’Vkpkj fuokj.k vf/kfu;e ,oa /kkjk 120&ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds rgr vkjksi fojfpr fd;k x;k gSA bl U;k;ky; ds er esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 8-2-2017 esa ,slh dksbZ =qfV izrhr ugha gksrh gS ftlls fd mlesa gLr{ksi fd;k tk lds vkSj iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dks Lohdkj fd;k tkosA

¶23

7- mijksDrkuqlkj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk ,oa LFkxu izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA 8- v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k ykSVk;k tkosA

¶24

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶25

Murari Sharma /6

Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan through P P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan through P P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Leeladhar Saini S/O Shri Laxman Ram Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramnari W/O Shri Nitesh D/O Shri Gangasahay Gurjar Vs Nitesh Khatana S/O Bharat Lal

Ramphool Vs State of Rajasthan through P.P.

Laxman Prasad Kayal S/O Shri Bansidhar Kayal B/C Hindu Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Prakash Chand Meena S/O Shri Hanuman Sahay Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil S/O Udaiveer B/C Jat Vs Smt. Divya W/O Anil D/O Jagdish B/C Jat