Allowed

Ramnari W/O Shri Nitesh D/O Shri Gangasahay Gurjar v. Nitesh Khatana S/O Bharat Lal

Rajasthan HC20 Nov 2021CRLR/824/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order quashes an executive order in a criminal revision petition. The High Court held that keeping a case pending for a few days, regardless of pending applications elsewhere, violates principles of natural justice applicable to child custody cases.

What did the court decide?

The impugned executive order is quashed and set aside. The respondents in the child's case are directed to order the child's release and dispose of the case in accordance with law.

Ramnari W/O Shri Nitesh D/O Shri… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 824/2021

¶3

Smt. Ramnari W/o Shri Nitesh D/o Shri Gangasahay Gurjar, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Jakholash Khurd, Tehsil Bawanbas, Distt. Sawaimadhopur (Rajasthan) Mob 9887330097 Of Brother Navdeep Singh

¶4

----Petitioner Versus

¶5

Nitesh Khatana S/o Bharat Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Shiv Colony, Near Shreeji, Mandir, Near Pyare Lal Ka Garden Gangapur City, Distt. Sawaimadhopur

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Deptt. Of Women And Child Welfare Govt Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur

¶7

Bal Kalyan Samiti Sawaimadhopur, Through Its Chairman

¶8

Sho Police Station Batoda, Distt. Sawaimadhopur Rajasthan ----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivcharan Gupta For : Mr. Imran Khan, P.P. For Respondent(s) Respondent Nos. 2 to 4

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

20/11/2021

¶13

1- ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk ;kph }kjk vius ifr v;kph dze 01 rFkk vU; v;kphx.k ds fo#) /kkjk 102 fd’kksj U;k; ¼ckydksa ds ns[kHkky ,oa laj{k.k½ vf/kfu;e] 2015 ¼ftls vkxs

¶14

(2 of 3)

¶15

[CRLR-824/2021]

¶16

^^vf/kfu;e] 2015** dgk tkosxk½ ds rgr v;kph dze 03 }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fnukad 02-08-2021 o 10-08-2021 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dhA

¶17

2- fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph rFkk v;kph dze 02 ls 04 dh cgl lquh xbZ] v;kph dze 01 dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶18

3- ;kph Jherh jkeujh o v;kph dze 01 furs’k [kVkuk dze’k% ifr o iRuh gS] ftuds chp dqN fookn yafcr gS] ysfdu gLrxr ekeys esa muds 04 o"khZ; iq= ckyd oa’kq dh lqiqnZxh dk ekeyk gS] vr% mlh lhek rd bl U;k;ky; dks lhfer jguk gSA

¶19

4- v;kph dze 03 }kjk fnukad 02-08-2021 ds vk{ksfir vkns’k ds ek/;e ls ckyd oa’kq dh vfHkj{kk] ns[kHkky o ykyu&ikyu ds fy, v;kph dze 01 dks vLFkk;h :i ls lqiqnZ dj vafre lquokbZ gsrq fnukad 10-08-2021 dks cSBd r; dh xbZ] ysfdu ml fnu v;kph dze 01 }kjk ;g crk;k x;k fd bl laca/k esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; esa ,d fjV ;kfpdk lh-MCY;w-@23342@2021 fnukad 07-08-2021 dks izLrqr dj nh xbZ gS] tks yafcr gS vkSj bl ;kfpdk ds dkj.k ls vk{ksfir vkns’k fnukad 10-08-2021 ds ek/;e ls lfefr }kjk ;g fu.kZ; fy;k x;k fd mijksDr ;kfpdk ds fu.kZ; ds i’pkr~ gh lfefr vkxkeh dk;Zokgh djsxhA

¶20

5- ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; esa izLrqr mijksDr ;kfpdk lh-MCY;w-@23342@2021 fnukad 07-08-2021 esa dksbZ LFkxu vkns’k ugha gS] bl rF; dks ;kph o v;kph dze 02 yxk;r 04 }kjk Lohdkj fd;k x;k gSA

¶21

6- fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph ds }kjk U;kf;d n`"Vkar Roxann Sharma Vs. Arun Sharma, (2015) 8 SCC

¶22

(3 of 3) [CRLR-824/2021]

¶23

318 izLrqr djrs gq;s fuosnu fd;k fd 05 o"kZ ls de vk;q ds cPps dh vfHkj{kk ekrk dks lqiqnZ fd;k tkuk vko’;d gSA

¶24

7- bl ekeys esa Li"V gS fd ek= ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; esa ;kfpdk izLrqr dj fn;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij cky dY;k.k lfefr }kjk fnukad 10-08-2021 dks dksbZ vUrfje vkns’k ikfjr ugha dj dk;Zokgh LFkfxr j[kh gS] tcfd mijksDr ;kfpdk esa dksbZ LFkxu ugha gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa lfefr ds fy, ;g visf{kr Fkk fd og 05 o"kZ ls de vk;q ds cPps dh vfHkj{kk ds laca/k esa miyC/k lkexzh ds vk/kkj ij mfpr vkns’k ikfjr djsa] tc rd mijksDr ;kfpdk esa dksbZ LFkxu vkns’k u gks] lfefr }kjk dk;Zokgh LFkfxr j[kk tkuk mfpr ugha gSA

¶25

8- mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk vkaf’kd :i ls Lohdkj dj v;kph dze 03 }kjk fnukad 10-08-2021 ds ek/;e ls vkxkeh dk;Zokgh dks LFkfxr j[ks tkus rFkk ;FkkfLFkfr cuk;s j[kus ds ckcr tks vkns’k fn;k x;k gS] mls vikLr dj v;kph dze 03 dks vkns’k fn;k tkrk gS fd ckyd oa’kq dh vfHkj{kk dh lqiqnZxh dk ekeyk lacaf/kr i{kksa dks lqudj 'kh?kzrk’kh?kz fuLrkfjr djsaA

¶26

9- mijksDrkuqlkj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk vkaf’kd :i ls Lohdkj dj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA

¶27

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶28

Murari Lal Sharma /84

Ramnari W/O Shri Nitesh D/O Shri Gangasahay Gurjar v. Nitesh Khatana S/O Bharat Lal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramnari W/O Shri Nitesh D/O Shri Gangasahay Gurjar v. Nitesh Khatana S/O Bharat Lal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Surana S/O Shri Ashok Surana Vs Smt. Ritu W/O Shri Suraj Surana, D/O Shri Bajrang Singh

Mukesh Saini S/O Gajanand Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahesh S/O Bajranglal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Ram Raj Vs State and Anr.

Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Shankar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sardar Singh S/O Ummed Singh Vs State of Rajasthan