Dismissed
Rajkumar v. State
Rajasthan HCCRLMP/740/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Must be null as the judgment is a non-substantive order dismissing the petition as not pressed without addressing any legal issue.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
¶2
JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 740/2020
¶4
- Rajkumar S/o Shri Mohanlal Kalal, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste Kalal, R/o Manpura, P.s. Mandalgarh, Dist. Bhilwara (Raj.).
¶5
- Kamlesh Kumar S/o Shri Ramdev Meghwal, Aged About 28 Years, By Caste Meghwal, R/o Shyampura, P.s. Mandalgarh, Dist. Bhilwara (Raj.).
¶6
----Petitioners
¶7
Versus
¶8
- State, Through P.p.
¶9
- Shankar Lal Meena S/o Shri Amra Ji Meena, By Caste Meena, Presently Posted As Asi At P.s. Peepalkhoont, Dist. Pratapgarh (Raj.) R/o Jhuthari, Kherwara, Dist. Udaipur (Raj.).
¶10
----Respondents
¶11
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Kumar Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Rajkumar S/o Shri Mohanlal Kalal
- petitioner
Kamlesh Kumar S/o Shri Ramdev Meghwal
- respondent
State, Through P.p.
- respondent
Shankar Lal Meena S/o Shri Amra Ji Meena
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/740/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court