Disposed

Heena Mehar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Sept 2021CRLMP/1891/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought directions for security and protection due to alleged grave threat to the petitioners' lives. The Court disposed of the petition immediately, directing the petitioners to approach the SHO at Sojat City Police Station with representation to assess threat perceptions and obtain necessary security orders.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioners to appear before SHO, Sojat City, District Pali, along with representation, regarding their grievance for assessment of threat and provision of security.

Heena Mehar Vs State of Rajasthan — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

(1 of 2)

¶2

[CRLMP-1891/2021]

¶3

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶4

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1891/2021

¶5

Heena Mehar D/o Babu Khan, Aged About 23 Years, By Caste Muslim, R/o Hadiya Kuda, Kumaro Ka Bass, Sojat, District Pali (Rajasthan).

¶6

Dinesh Garg S/o Paras Mal, Aged About 25 Years, Dilli Darwaja, Narsinhpura, Sojat City, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali (Rajasthan).

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶10

Inspector General Of Police, Jodhpur, Jodhpur.

¶11

Superintendent Of Police, Pali.

¶12

Sho P.s. Sojat City, District Pali.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kan Singh Oad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP

¶15

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶16

Order

¶17

22/09/2021

¶18

In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.

¶19

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal

¶21

(2 of 2)

¶22

[CRLMP-1891/2021]

¶23

liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same.

¶24

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as perusing the record of the case, this Court disposes of the present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the Station House Officer, Police Station Sojat City, District Pali alongwith appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The Station House Officer, Police Station Sojat City, District Pali shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶25

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

¶26

Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶27

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶28

50-Sudheer/-

Heena Mehar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Heena Mehar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhram Vs State of Rajasthan

Jamana Lal Gayari Vs State of Rajasthan

Shrawannath Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep Vs State

Vandana @ Pooja Vs Nagendra Parihar

Surendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan