Disposed

Firoz Mohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC29 Jan 2021CRLMP/572/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR. The court, relying on the public prosecutor's assurance that a representation would be considered before investigation concludes, disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

The petition is disposed of with a direction to the investigating authority to consider the petitioner's representation within ten days.

Firoz Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 572/2021

¶3

Firoz Mohammad S/o Shri Shakur Mohammad, Aged About 31 Years, Ganesh Nagar, Phada Gandhinagar, District Udaipur (Rajasthan).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

Rajendra Kumar Chawat S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Chawat, Pandupur, District Mysore (Karnataka).

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Mehta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP

¶10

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶11

Order

¶12

29/01/2021

¶13

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶14

The petitioner has preferred this misc. petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.37/2020 lodged at P.S. Sukher, District Udaipur for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants to submit a representation alongwith all the relevant documents before the concerned investigating authority.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the petitioner submits a representation alongwith all the necessary documents before the concerned investigating authority within a

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-572/2021]

¶18

period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law, before completing the investigation.

¶19

In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the petitioner submits a representation alongwith all the necessary documents before it within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided before completing the investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶20

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶21

137-Nirmala/Sanjay/-

Firoz Mohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Firoz Mohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravta Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kalulal Vaishnav Vs State

Urmila Kanwar Vs State

Budharam Vs State of Rajasthan

Dayanand Vs State

Anasi Choudhary Vs State