Dayanand v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of an FIR. The Court directed the investigating officer to consider the petitioner's representation before concluding the investigation.
What did the court decide?
Direction to investigating officer to consider petitioner's representation before concluding investigation; criminal miscellaneous petition and stay petition disposed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 349/2021
Dayanand S/o Shri Ranvir, Aged About 19 Years, Ward No. 14, Paralika, 20 Ntr, Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
- Versus
- State, Through P.p.
- Dalip Singh S/o Shri Shishpal Jat, Salesman Of Liquor Shop, R/o Parlika, Nohar, Gogamedi, Hanumangarh.
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vikas Bijarnia |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. SS Rajpurohit, PP |
| Mr. Suresh Nehra |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
29/01/2021
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner may be allowed to submit representation to the investigating officer before concluding the investigation under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dayanand S/o Shri Ranvir
- respondent
State
- respondent
Dalip Singh S/o Shri Shishpal Jat
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/349/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court