Disposed

Vinod Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 Jan 2021CRLMP/390/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of an FIR. Instead of a final decision on quashing, the court directed the investigating officer to consider the petitioners' representation while concluding the investigation and disposed of the stay petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed investigating officer to consider petitioners' representation before concluding investigation; stay petition disposed of.

Vinod Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 390/2021

¶3

Vinod Singh S/o Sh. Amar Singh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Ward No. 01, Jodkiya, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

¶4

Mahendra Singh S/o Sh. Vinod Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ward No. 01, Jodkiya, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

¶5

Rajendra Singh S/o Sh. Vinod Singh, Aged About 17 Years, R/o Ward No. 01, Jodkiya, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

Jaipal Singh S/o Chiman Singh, R/o Ward No. 01, Jodkiya, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.JS Khichi.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.Gaurav Singh,PP.

¶12

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶13

Order

¶14

21/01/2021

¶15

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶16

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.723/2020 registered at Police Station Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangarh.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset submits that the petitioners may be allowed to give representation

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMP-390/2021]

¶20

along with relevant documents to the investigating officer which may be considered before filing the result of investigation.

¶21

Accordingly, this misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the investigating officer to consider the representation of the petitioners while concluding the investigation, strictly in accordance with law.

¶22

5. Stay petition also stands disposed of.

¶23

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶24

337-SPhophaliya/-

Vinod Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Ditiya Vs State

Pukhraj Vs State

Shyam Nath Vs State

Chetanram Vs State

Suman Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan