This order briefly notes that the petition was filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking protection. The court directs petitioners to approach the SHO with evidence, who will then decide on security measures. It clarifies that this order does not affect other proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 2)
[CRLMP-4407/2021]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4407/2021
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. SS Sisodia |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Jaipal Singh | ||
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Arun Kumar, PP |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
25/08/2021
In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.
The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-4407/2021]
the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as perusing the record of the case, this Court disposes of the present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the Station House Officer, Police Station Taranagar, District Churu alongwith appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The Station House Officer, Police Station Taranagar, District Churu shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.
It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.
Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
125-Sudheer/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether necessary directions in the nature of protection/security should be issued to the petitioners under Article 21 of the Constitution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manjeeta D/o Sh. Manoharlal
Pramod Kumar S/o Sh. Ramswaroop
State Of Rajasthan
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
