Gutta Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court quashed an FIR invoking its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after ascertaining a bona fide compromise between the petitioners and the complainant, relying on Gian Singh v. State of Punjab.
What did the court decide?
FIR No.79/2020 for offences under Sections 143, 341, 323, 379 IPC and all consequent proceedings against the petitioners are quashed; stay petition disposed of.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4271/2020
- Gutta Ram S/o Heera Ram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Sainsara, Tehsil Rinya Badi, Dist. Nagaur.
- Nimba Ram S/o Shankar Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Sainsara, Tehsil Rinya Badi, District Nagaur.
----Petitioners
Versus
- State, Through Pp 2. Suresh S/o Manga Ram, R/o Sainsara, Teh. Rinya Badi, Dist. Nagaur.
| ----Respondents | ||
|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. PradeepChoudhary |
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi PP for the State. Mr. Ravindra Acharya. |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
12/02/2021
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings should be quashed in light of a compromise between the petitioners as first degree relatives and the complainant.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gutta Ram S/o Heera Ram
- petitioner
Nimba Ram S/o Shankar Ram
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/4271/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court