Nema Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition and quashed an FIR. Relying on Gan Singh, the court invoked its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings where a compromise was reached between close family members.
What did the court decide?
FIR No. 0078/2020 and entire proceedings under Sections 341, 323, and 34 of IPC were quashed; stay petition disposed of.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 315/2021
- Nema Ram S/o Lala Ram, Aged About 30 Years, Saisada, P.s. Padu Kallan, District Nagaur.
- Raju Ram S/o Shankar Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Saisada, P.s. Padu Kallan, District Nagaur.
----Petitioners
Versus
- State, Through P.p. 2. Dunga Ram S/o Shri Heera Ram, Saisada, P.s. Padu Kallan, District Nagaur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Acharya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi PP for the State. Mr. Pradeep Choudhary
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
12/02/2021
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can quash the FIR and proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. upon a compromise between close relatives.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nema Ram S/o Lala Ram
- petitioner
Raju Ram S/o Shankar Ram
- respondent
State
- respondent
Dunga Ram S/o Shri Heera Ram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/315/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court