High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition and a stay petition relying on the Public Prosecutor's submission that the FIR was a counterblast under prevailing COVID-19 safety protocols.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 366/2021
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuj Sahlot For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP Dr. Kshamendra Mathur (on VC) Mr. Narendra Jain, C.I., Mahila Thana, Jodhpur
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
22/09/2021
In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.
At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor alongwith investigating officer submit that the present FIR is a counterblast, and thus, they are proposing the final report/closure report.
In light of such submission, the present petition is disposed of. Stay petition also stands disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
42-Zeeshan
Smt Aarushi Jain W/o Himanshu Chordiya, Alpna Jain W/o Anil Jain, Anil Jain S/o Manoharlal Ji
State, Through Pp
Renu Chordiya W/o Anil Chordiya
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
