Satbirsingh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This order quashes criminal proceedings registered against the petitioner under the Excise Act for alleged offences involving a seized vehicle, finding he sold the vehicle before the incident.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings initiated against the petitioner on the basis of FIR No.188/2019 are hereby quashed; all pending applications are disposed of.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 241/2020
Satbirsingh S/o Jilesingh, Aged About 50 Years, Dhanir, Tehsil Narwana, Dsitrict Jind, Haryana.
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through P.p.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. R S Choudhary |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Gaurav Singh,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
04/02/2021
- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been roped in the case solely on the ground that the vehicle which was seized was said to be registered ownership of the petitioner.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings against the petitioner be quashed on the ground that the vehicle was already sold and ownership transferred before the alleged offence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satbirsingh S/o Jilesingh
- respondent
State, Through P.p.
Coram
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/241/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court