Disposed

Smt Pushpa v. State

Rajasthan HC15 Jan 2021CRLMP/220/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought protection from private respondents who opposed their marriage solemnized on 06.01.2021. High Court disposed petition by directing police to ensure safety while clarifying order does not prove age or affect other proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to SHO, Police Station Ghamoorwali to ensure necessary vigil for safety of petitioners against threats from opposed relatives.

Smt Pushpa Vs State — Matrimonial and Divorce | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 220/2021

¶3

Smt Pushpa D/o Madan Lal, W/o Mahendra, Aged About 19 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/o Ward No. 11, Binjhawayla, Teh. Padampur, District Sriganganagar (Raj.).

¶4

Mahendra S/o Tara Chand, Aged About 25 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Ward No. 10, Binjhawayla, Teh. Padampur, District Sriganganagar (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

The Superintendent Of Police, Sriganganagar (Raj.).

¶9

The Station House Officer, Police Station Ghamoorwali, Dist. Sriganganagar (Raj.).

¶10

Madan Lal S/o Richhpal, B/c Meghwal, R/o Ward No. 11, Binjhawayla, Teh. Padampur, District Sriganganagar (Raj.).

¶11

Puran Ram S/o Richhpal, B/c Meghwal, R/o Ward No. 11, Binjhawayla, Teh. Padampur, District Sriganganagar (Raj.).

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Om Singh Chouhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. SK Bhati, PP

¶14

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶15

Order

¶16

15/01/2021

¶17

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶18

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLMP-220/2021]

¶21

protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondents no. 4 & 5 in view of solemnization of their marriage with each other on 06.1.2021.

¶22

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that nobody can be permitted to take law in his own hands merely because marriage is not acceptable.

¶23

Consequently, the present misc. petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the SHO, Police Station, Ghamoorwali, Dist. Sriganganagar to ensure necessary vigil that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to the marriage.

¶24

It is made clear that this order is not a proof of age and the marriage of the petitioners and any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners at the instances of their relatives.

¶25

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

¶26

160-Sanjay/-

Smt Pushpa v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Pushpa v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs Mukesh Tyagi

Ratan Kanwar Vs Lrs of Gangaram

The Executive Engineer Vs Rameshwar Lal

Ranu Singh Vs the Rajasthan Public Service Commission

Chandrakala Vs Madan Lal Rankawat

Shriram Bhargaw Vs Smt. Vijendradevi