Allowed

Abdul Gani S/O Shri Allahnoor, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC26 Aug 2021CRLMB/9626/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for two petitioners arrested for theft. The court deemed it just and proper to enlarge them on bail after placing them in a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners shall be enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Abdul Gani S/O Shri Allahnoor, Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9626/2021

¶3

Abdul Gani S/o Shri Allahnoor, R/o Lata House, Ram Raheem Colony, Masjid Ke Pass, Ward No. 33, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur, Raj. ( At Present Confined In Kota Jail ).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12391/2021

¶10

Ubed Ahmed S/o Nishar Ahmed, R/o H.no. 13 Rajaji Ka Kua Sofiya College Road Kotwali Dist. Bhopal M.p. (At Present In Jail At Kota)

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sajid Ali, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Ola, PP

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶16

Order

¶17

26/08/2021

¶18

The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.83/2021 Registered at Police Station Borkheda, Kota City for the offence(s) under Section 379 IPC.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are behind the bars since 09.04.2021. Charge-sheet

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CRLMB-9626/2021]

¶22

has been filed against the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that similarly situated co-accused person was enlarged on bail by the Additional Sessions Judge. Offence against the petitioners is triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶23

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications.

¶24

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶25

Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Abdul Gani S/o Shri Allahnoor and Ubed Ahmed S/o Nishar Ahmed shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶26

A copy of this order be placed in each connected file.

¶27

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶28

PRAVESH/03-04

Abdul Gani S/O Shri Allahnoor, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Gani S/O Shri Allahnoor, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemraj S/O Bhairulal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sharif S/O Nazir Mohammed, Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish @ Bakri Son of Shri Prakash Chand, Vs State of Rajasthan

Babli Khan S/O Banshi Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram S/O Shri Banwarilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Surjan Singh Son of Suren Singh Vs State of Rajasthan