The High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail to the petitioner charged under Section 384 IPC, who argued false implication and potential delay in the trial.
Enlargement of the petitioner on bail conditioned on furnishing a personal bond of Rs 50,000 with two sureties of Rs 25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13589/2021
Vikram S/o Shri Banwarilal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Khutla Ki Dhani Tan Kot Ps Udaipurwati Dist. Jhunjhunu At Present In Dist. Jail Jhunjhunu
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Ola, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
26/08/2021
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-13589/2021]
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Gourav/143
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible to be enlarged on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. considering the false implication argument.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikram S/o Shri Banwarilal
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
