Bail application dismissed as not pressed. Petitioner sought liberty to file fresh application after recording statement of Seizure Officer, prayer granted even though main application rejected.
Liberty to move fresh bail application after recording statement of Seizure Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9470/2021
Satya Narayin S/o Prahlad Nayak, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Mundoli Police Station Arai, Dist. Ajmer, At Present Nayko Ka Mohalla, Ambapura, P.S. Malpura, Dist. Tonk (Raj.). (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Chittorgarh).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Bhati, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
18/08/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he does not want to press the present bail application at this stage but seeks liberty for the accused-petitioner to move fresh bail application after recording the statement of Seizure Officer.
Accordingly, the instant bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the accused-petitioner Satya Narayin S/o Prahlad Nayak , is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J
176-/Akshay/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application pressed by the petitioner should be allowed considering his request for liberty to file a fresh application later.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satya Narayin S/o Prahlad Nayak
State Of Rajasthan through PP
Deendra Kachhawaha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
