Allowed

Bharatraj S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Nov 2021CRLMB/8979/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed by Bharatraj, accused in an FIR under Sections 8/29 NDPS Act. The court released him on bail pending conclusion of the trial, directing him to furnish a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in connection with FIR No.15/2021 provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Bharatraj S/O Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8979/2021

¶3

Bharatraj S/o Babulal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Devpura, Police Station Duni, Distt. Tonk (Raj.).

¶4

(Accused/ Petitioner In District Jail Tonk)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

17/11/2021

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No.15/2021 was registered at P.S. Duni, District Tonk for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner was arrested. Thereafter, he moved the bail application before the trial court, which vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence, this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as he has nothing to do with the alleged incident. Counsel further submits that the accused petitioner is behind bars since long. Allegation against the accused petitioner is for the offence under

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-8979/2021]

¶17

Section 8/29 NDPS Act. Charge-sheet has already been filed. Conclusion of the trial may likely to take time. Hence the accused petitioner be released on bail.

¶18

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for accused petitioner, note of the allegations levelled against the petitioner as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Bharatraj S/o Babulal shall be released on bail in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶22

Ritu/4

Bharatraj S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharatraj S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kartar Singh Son of Shri Mahavir Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Pramod Kumar S/O Rampratap Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilip S/O Bhojraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Ankit Sharma S/O Shri Ratanlal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikash Son of Banwari Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kalyan Dutt Meena S/O Shri Kisnaram Vs State of Rajasthan