Allowed

Dilip S/O Bhojraj v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Nov 2021CRLMB/16236/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail to Dilip S/o Bhojraj accused of offences under Sections 366/34 and 364 IPC, releasing him on a personal bond of Rupees 50,000 along with two sureties each in the sum of Rupees 25,000.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be released on bail in connection with the FIR on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each.

Dilip S/O Bhojraj Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16236/2021

¶3

Dilip S/o Bhojraj, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vill. Chhajawa P.S. Atru Dist. Baran Raj.

¶4

(At Present In Dist. Jail Baran)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Nagar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ramesh Choudhary, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

16/11/2021

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No.500/2021 was registered at P.S. Kotwali Baran District Baran for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner was arrested. Thereafter, he moved the bail application before the trial court, which vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence, this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as he has nothing to do with the alleged incident. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is simply a driver who was driving the Taxi on rent. The police arrested the petitioner for commission of

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-16236/2021]

¶16

offence under Section 366/34 and 364 (A) IPC. Charge-sheet has already been filed. Counsel further submits that the accused petitioner is behind bars since long. Conclusion of the trial may likely take time. Hence the accused petitioner be released on bail.

¶17

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶18

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for accused petitioner, note of the allegations levelled against the petitioner as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶19

Therefore, this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Dilip S/o Bhojraj shall be released on bail in connection with aforementioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶21

Ritu/15

Dilip S/O Bhojraj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip S/O Bhojraj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghuveer Singh S/O Gopal Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Radheyshyam S/O Gokul Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Sadam Khan S/O Imammudin Vs State of Rajasthan

Kartar Singh Son of Shri Mahavir Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Pramod Kumar S/O Rampratap Vs State of Rajasthan

Hansraj Son of Shyokishan Vs State of Rajasthan