Allowed

Sushil S/O Shri Ramkaran v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Jul 2021CRLMB/8466/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order allowing bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a murder and attempted murder case. Court held that given contradictory witness statements and prior co-accused bail, the bail application was allowed subject to personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Sushil S/O Shri Ramkaran Vs State of Rajasthan — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 8466/2021

¶3

Sushil S/o Shri Ramkaran, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Jakharo Ki Dhani Tan Fatehpur Ps Bansur Dist. Alwar Raj. At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli Dist. Jaipur

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Raghav For State : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶10

Order

¶11

22/07/2021

¶12

Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section

¶13

439 of Cr.P.C.

¶14

F.I.R. No. 187/2020 registered at Police Station Bansur District Alwar for offence under Sections 323, 341, 448, 307 & 302 of I.P.C.

¶15

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that PW-1 to PW-6 have turned hostile. As per the statement of PW-7-father of the deceased, the allegation against the petitioner is of causing injury on the head, whereas, as per the postmortem report, the deceased died due to Injury No.1, which was a stab wound caused on the chest of deceased. It is also contended that co-accused have been given benefit of bail.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

I have considered the contentions.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMB-8466/2021]

¶20

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

¶21

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶23

AMIT KUMAR /10

Sushil S/O Shri Ramkaran v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil S/O Shri Ramkaran v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Karishma @ Kasso W/O Wasim Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinay Kumar S/O Sita Ram Vs Union of India

Kailash Son of Kadu Vs State of Rajasthan

Madanlal Son of Shri Danmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Juned Alam S/O Shri Mohammed Habibul Rahman Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Jaheer Alam S/O Shri Mohammed Basheer Vs State of Rajasthan