Allowed

Smt. Pushpa Devi Biyani W/O Late Shri Jugal Kishore Biyani v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Aug 2021CRLMB/7659/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by two accused persons facing charges of cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy. The petitioners were directed to execute a personal bond with sureties and comply with specific conditions during the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed with personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Smt. Pushpa Devi Biyani W/O Late Shri Jugal Kishore… — Caste Atrocities | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7659/2021

¶3

Smt. Pushpa Devi Biyani W/o Late Shri Jugal Kishore Biyani, Aged About 78 Years, R/o C-1, C-2, L.s. Nagar, Sector-3, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶4

Sanjay Biyani S/o Late Shri Jugal Kishore Biyani, Aged About 50 Years, R/o C-1, C-2, L.s. Nagar, Sector-3, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. S. Hora, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

13/08/2021

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.264/2017 registered at Police Station Chandwaji, District Jaipur (Rural) for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 120-B IPC.

¶14

On consideration of submissions made on behalf of the respective parties and the material made available for my perusal as well as the evidence collected during investigation, which has been produced before me by way of case diary but without expressing any final opinion on the merit and de-merit of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of anticipatory bail to the accusedpetitioners.

¶15

Consequently, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed.

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-7659/2021]

¶17

The SHO/IO/Arresting Authority, Police Station Chandwaji, District Jaipur (Rural) in FIR No.264/2017 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners- Smt. Pushpa Devi Biyani W/o Late Shri Jugal Kishore Biyani and Sanjay Biyani S/o Late

¶18

Shri Jugal Kishore Biyani , they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions :-

¶19

(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶20

(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶21

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶22

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶23

Jatin /30

Smt. Pushpa Devi Biyani W/O Late Shri Jugal Kishore Biyani v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Pushpa Devi Biyani W/O Late Shri Jugal Kishore Biyani v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Matebul S/O Mumtaj Ansari Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Suraj Mal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Babita Sabu W/O Shri Vijay Kumar Sabu Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohandai D/O Shri Surjan Singh W/O Kuljeet Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh S/O Shri Surjansingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Dheeraj Kumar S/O Omprakash Vs State of Rajasthan