Allowed

Rinku S/O Lalluram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Jan 2021CRLMB/6402/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the fourth bail application of the accused under Section 439 CrPC. The court noted the prolonged custody since 2015 and lack of witnesses examined after March 2020, directing release against furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Accused released on bail with personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.

Rinku S/O Lalluram Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Fourth Bail Application No.

¶3

6402/2020

¶4

Rinku S/o Lalluram, R/o Shahod PS Bhiwadi Dist. Alwar (Accused In Sub Dist. Jail Kishangarhbas)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, through PP

¶8

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.R. Goyal through VC For State : Mr. Deshraj Gosingha, PP For Complainant(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Jain through VC

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶10

Order

¶11

06/01/2021

¶12

Petitioner has filed this fourth bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

¶13

F.I.R. No. 504/2015 was registered at Police Station Bhiwadi, District Alwar, for offence under Section 302/34 of IPC.

¶14

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has remained in custody for a period of five year and four months. After 06.03.2020 no witnesses have been examined. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. Last seen witness has turned hostile. Even in the charge-sheet, no motive is shown for commission of offence. Conclusion of trial will take time.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have opposed the fourth bail application.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-6402/2020]

¶18

I have considered the contentions.

¶19

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the fourth bail application.

¶20

This fourth bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to

¶21

do so.

¶22

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶23

Heena/15

Rinku S/O Lalluram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinku S/O Lalluram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.N. Agrawal S/O Late Shri R.P. Agrawal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shashi Rawat Widow of Late Shri Prakash Chand Rawat B/C Rawat Vs State of Rajasthan

Satguru S/O Baldev Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kajodmal S/O Shri Radhakishan B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Prasad S/O Shri Ramesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Paliya S/O Ram Singh Paliya Vs State of Rajasthan