Allowed

Israil S/O Shri Imam Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Aug 2021CRLMB/5602/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, aged about 70 and 68 years, in a false implication matter under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC. A personal bond and other conditions were prescribed upon the arrest of the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

The anticipatory bail application is allowed; petitioners to be released on bail if arrested, upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties in Rs.25,000 each.

Israil S/O Shri Imam Khan Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5602/2021

¶3

Israil S/o Shri Imam Khan, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Vill. Ikhanka Ps Pahadi Dist. Bharatpur

¶4

Smt. Asini W/o Shri Israil, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Vill. Ikhanka Ps Pahadi Dist. Bharatpur

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, Adv. through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Ola, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

11/08/2021

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.144/2020 Registered at Police Station Pahadi, District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Leaned counsel for the petitioners also submits that co-accused-Irfan was enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court under Section 439 Cr. P. C. Investigation has been completed against the petitioners. Nothing is to be recovered from the petitioners.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-5602/2021]

¶19

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶20

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Police Station Pahadi, District Bharatpur in F.I.R. No.144/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners – Israil S/o Shri Imam Khan & Smt. Asini W/o Shri Israil , they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶21

(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶22

(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶23

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶24

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶25

Gourav/19

Israil S/O Shri Imam Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Israil S/O Shri Imam Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muveen S/O Ayub Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramswaroop S/O Devlal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Tejram @ Teju S/O Shri Devilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shobharam S/O Shri Ramprasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Goswami S/O Amit Goswami Vs State of Rajasthan

Kunal Goswami S/O Amit Goswami Vs State of Rajasthan