The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on three consecutive dates.
Bail application dismissed for non-prosecution for total absence of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5070/2021
Raju Ram @ Raja Ram S/o Sh. Jetha Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Bhakrod, At Present Shiv Bhole (Dariyav Nagar), Nagaur Dist. Nagaur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Judgment / Order
15/11/2021
It transpires that on 06.10.2021, this Court noted the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed in the present case. On the next date i.e. 25.10.2021, none appeared for the petitioner. Today, also, none appears on behalf of the petitioner.
In view of the above, this criminal misc. bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
132-Taruna/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the absence of appearance.
Whether to dismiss the bail application for non-prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raju Ram @ Raja Ram S/o Sh. Jetha Ram
State Of Rajasthan
S UDESH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
