Allowed

Sukh Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Nov 2021CRLMB/15218/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jodhpur, through Justice Sudesh Bansal, allowed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an accused charged with offences under the Excise Act. The court deemed it just and proper to grant bail contingent upon execution of a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each to trial court.

Sukh Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15218/2021

¶3

Sukh Lal S/o Shri Pema Ji Dangi, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Mandesar Tus Dangiyan, Police Station- Dabok, District Udaipur (Rajasthan) . (Presently Lodged At District Jail, Banswara)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Shrimali For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, AGC

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

¶10

Judgment / Order

¶11

15/11/2021

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No. 67/2021 of Police Station Sallopat, District Banswara for the offences punishable under Section 19/54, 54-A of Excise Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by a magistrate and the petitioner is in judicial custody since his arrest and investigation/trial of the case will take its own time.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-15218/2021]

¶19

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sukh Lal S/o Shri Pema Ji Dangi shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 67/2021 of Police Station Sallopat, District Banswara provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

¶22

78-Taruna/-

Sukh Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukh Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subodh Vs State of Rajasthan

Deepli Vs State of Rajasthan

Awtar Singh Vs State

Imran Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramchandra Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju Ram @ Raja Ram Vs State of Rajasthan