Criminal Private half-bail application regarding alleged cheating under Section 420 IPC. Court rejected bail due to gravity of offence concerning property dispute.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5039/2021
Rashmi Khandelwal W/o Shri Mahendra Khandelwal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 159, Vinoda Vihar Malviya Nagar Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Ola, PP Mr. Mahesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Brij Mohan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Raj Kumar Tongawat, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
02/08/2021
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-5039/2021]
police had filed the final report in the complaint filed by the Shyam Yaduvanshi and Binderpal. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner. So, the petitioner be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /30
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner who is accused of cheating.
Whether the allegation of false implication in a civil dispute justifies granting bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rashmi Khandelwal
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
