In this bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought anticipatory bail for alleged offences under IPC Sections 457 and 354 and the IT Act. The High Court dismissed the application without granting bail due to the gravity of the charges.
Bail application dismissed; benefit of anticipatory bail not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3125/2021
Than Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bheemnagar Ps Bayana Dist. Bharatpur
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Ola, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
02/08/2021
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-3125/2021]
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /23
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. given the gravity of the alleged offences.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Than Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
