High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted interim bail to the petitioners, mother and son accused in a First Information Report (FIR) under Sections 98/2019 Cr.P.C., emphasizing compliance with court conditions and jurisdiction.
Bail granted to petitioners on conditions of appearance and within Rajasthan jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4280/2021
----Petitioners Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kaushal Goutam Through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Javed Gaori PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS (VACATION JUDGE)
Order
15/06/2021
izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk jk;flaguxj] ftyk Jhxaxkuxj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 98@2019] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 120ch] 467] 468] 471 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA
geus cgl vfxze tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
izkFkhZkx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dk rdZ jgk fd i{kdkjku ds e/; flfoy izdfr dk fookn gSA izkFkhZ;k&vfHk;qDrk dk **S** ”kY;k 70 o’khZ; o) efgyk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr la[;k 2 tlykiflag mldk iq= gSA ?kVuk dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa nhokuh izd`fr ds izdj.k dks QkStnkjh jax fn;k
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-4280/2021]
x;k gSA mUgksaus izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA
blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA
vfxze tekur vkosnu ij fopkj fd;kA cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, fd izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izd`fr o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr gksxkA
vkns”k gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr 1- dkS”kY;k iRuh lUrks[k flag] 2- tliky flag liq= Jh lUrks[kflag dks izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 98@2019] iqfyl Fkkuk jk;flaguxj] ftyk Jhxaxkuxj ds izdj.k esa fxj¶rkj djus dh fLFkfr esa fxj¶rkj djus okys vf/kdkjh dh larqf’V vuqlkj izR;sd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur fuEu “krksaZ lfgr is”k djus ij mUgsa vfxze tekur ij fjgk
dj fn;k tk;s %&
1- ;g fd izkFkhZx.k iqfyl }kjk iwNs tkus okys ifjiz”uksa dk mÙkj nsus ds fy, tSls vkSj tc visf{kr gks] miyC/k gksaxs]
(RAMESHWAR VYAS (VACATION JUDGE)),J
31-1/-
Lohra
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the mother and son accused under Section 98/2019 Cr.P.C.
Whether the accused will comply with bail conditions if granted bail.
Whether the accused will remain within the jurisdiction during the trial.
Kaushalya W/o Shri Santokh Singh
Jaspal Singh S/o Shri Santokh Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Rameshwar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
