This court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. against FIR for robbery. The petitioner was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
Anticipatory bail allowed. Petitioner to execute personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each on specific conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4163/2021
Jaswant Singh S/o Lal Singh, Aged About 39 Years, B/c Rajput, R/o Rawalgarh, Bailwa, Tehsil Balesar, Dist. Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Ranjeet Joshi, Adv. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Kapil Bissa,Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP |
| For Complainant(s) | : None |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
05/10/2021
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-4163/2021]
case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.
(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and
(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin/T.Singh/80
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be allowed in the facts and circumstances of the case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jaswant Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
