Allowed

Kishana Ram v. State

Rajasthan HC5 Oct 2021CRLMB/2901/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan allowed anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for petitioners charged under IPC Sections 427 and 379. Compromise proved undisputed; approval granted conditioned upon personal bond and sureties with standard directions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; conditioned on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each and standard undertakings.

Kishana Ram Vs State — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2901/2021

¶3

Kishana Ram S/o Sabla Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Dodiyana, Tehsil Riyan Badi, Dist. Nagaur

¶4

Gopal Ram S/o Sabla Ram, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Dodiyana, Tehsil Riyan Badi, Dist. Nagaur

----Petitioners

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Gaju Singh Rathore,Adv.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP
	Mr. B. S. Mertiya,Adv.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

05/10/2021

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.30/2021 registered at Police Station Padu Kala, District Nagaur for the offence(s) under Sections 427 and 379 IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a compromise has been arrived between the parties.

¶15

Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute this fact of compromise taken between the parties.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMB-2901/2021]

¶20

case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶21

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Padu Kala, District Nagaur in F.I.R. No.30/2021 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners- Kishana Ram S/o Sabla Ram and Gopal Ram S/o Sabla Ram , they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶24

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶26

Jatin/T.Singh/79

Kishana Ram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishana Ram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Navla Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Tag Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaswant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Chetan Vs State of Rajasthan

Prashant Vs State of Rajasthan