This order grants regular bail to a petitioner convicted under the NDPS Act for possession of a small quantity of smack. The High Court accepted the arguments regarding false implication and custody period without expressing an opinion on the merits.
Petitioner admitted to regular bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 34/2021
Mohmmad Husain@munna S/o Abdul Hamid, Aged About 24 Years, R/o House Number C 738-739 Sanjay Nagar Oppsite R.K. Hotel Jhulle Wala Mohlla Bhatta Basti Jaipur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
28/01/2021
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-34/2021]
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
CHARU SONI /4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who is confined in central jail pending trial for offences under the NDPS Act.
Whether the small quantity of drugs recovered (05.66 gram smack) warrants the grant of bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohmmad Husain@munna
State Of Rajasthan
Inderjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
