A bail application was filed by Kanhaiyalal challenging his detention. The petitioner's counsel withdrew the application and sought liberty to file a fresh one. The court dismissed the unpressed bail application while granting the liberty to proceed afresh.
Liberty granted to move a fresh bail application after recording the statement of the Seizure Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2996/2021
Kanhaiyalal S/o Chenaram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Dhamaliya PS Pratapgarh, Dist. Pratapgarh. (Presently Lodged In Pratapgarh Jail).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan through P.P.
| ----Respondent | ||
|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. V.K. Gaur |
|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, |
PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
25/10/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present bail application but seeks liberty for the petitioner to move fresh bail application after recording the statement of Seizure Officer.
Accordingly, the present bail application moved under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the accused-petitioner, Kanhaiyalal S/o Chenaram, stands dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J
2-Rashi/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application ought to be dismissed when not pressed by the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanhaiyalal S/o Chenaram
State of Rajasthan
DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
