The High Court allowed a bail application filed by the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C., directing his release on personal bond along with sureties.
Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 19087/2021
Dhanna Lal S/o Chhitarlal, R/o Barla Mundla Ps Atru District Baran Raj. At Present In Sub Jail Atru District Baran
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP Mr. Surendra Kumar Nagar (for complainant)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
06/12/2021
This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No.287/2021 was registered at P.S. Atru, District Baran for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner was arrested. Thereafter, he moved the bail application before the trial court, which vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence, this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as he has nothing to do with the alleged incident. Counsel further submits that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-19087/2021]
false and based on concocted facts. The accused petitioner has not inflicted any injury which is dangerous to life. Counsel further submits that the accused petitioner is behind the bars since long. Conclusion of the trial may likely to take time. Hence, the accused petitioner be released on bail.
On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor assisted with learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the bail application.
Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for accused petitioner, note of the allegations levelled against the petitioner as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.
Therefore, this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Dhanna Lal S/o Chhitarlal shall be released on bail in connection with aforementioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
CHARU/14
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhanna Lal S/o Chhitarlal
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
