Allowed

Suresh Kumar Kadvasara S/O Ganpatram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Nov 2021CRLMB/17198/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application filed by Suresh Kumar Kadvasara under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The court directed his release on personal bond with two sureties, noting the delay likely in trial conclusion, without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Suresh Kumar Kadvasara S/O Ganpatram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17198/2021

¶3

Suresh Kumar Kadvasara S/o Ganpatram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Biraniya, P.S. Sadar Fatehpur, District Sikar (Raj.). (At Present In Dist. Jail, Sikar)

¶4

--Accused--Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶9

Order

¶10

15/11/2021

¶11

This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶12

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No.166/2021 was registered at P.S. Fatehpur Sadar, District Sikar for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner was arrested. Thereafter, he moved the bail application before the trial court, which vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence, this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶13

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case as he has nothing to do with the alleged incident. Counsel further submits that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are totally false and concocted. Counsel further submits that the

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-17198/2021]

¶16

accused petitioner is behind the bars since long. Challan has been presented in the Court. Conclusion of the trial may likely to take time. Hence the accused petitioner be released on bail.

¶17

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶18

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for accused petitioner, note of the allegations levelled against the petitioner as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶19

Therefore, this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Suresh Kumar Kadvasara S/o Ganpatram shall be released on bail in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶21

CHARU/14

Suresh Kumar Kadvasara S/O Ganpatram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar Kadvasara S/O Ganpatram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kailashchand S/O Kajodi Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Pawan S/O Shri Rajendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajharudeen Saiyad S/O Mohammad Husain Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghuveer Singh S/O Gopal Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Radheyshyam S/O Gokul Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Sadam Khan S/O Imammudin Vs State of Rajasthan