Allowed

Pawan S/O Shri Rajendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Nov 2021CRLMB/15903/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, directing their release on bail in the event of arrest based on a bond and specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; upon arrest, petitioners to be released on bail via personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Pawan S/O Shri Rajendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15903/2021

¶3

Pawan S/o Shri Rajendra Singh, R/o Baloda P.S. Surajgarh Jhunjhunu Raj.

¶4

Jitendra S/o Shri Ummed Singh, R/o Baloda P.S. Surajgarh Jhunjhunu Raj.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Amit Punia
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Laxman Meena, PP
	Mr. Tapeshwar Pal Singh Parmar for
	the complainant

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

12/11/2021

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the accusedpetitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR 174/2020 registered at P.S. Surajgarh Distt. Jhunjhunu for the offences mentioned therein against the petitioners, whereupon the investigation was commenced. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners moved the bail application before the court below, which was dismissed. Hence, this bail application has been filed.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material made available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case as

¶16

(2 of 3)

¶17

[CRLMB-15903/2021]

¶18

they have nothing to do with the alleged incident. Learned counsel submits that co-accused Jani Kumar S/o Shri Arjun Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.09.2021. Custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. Hence, the petitioners be released on pre-arrest bail.

¶19

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by counsel for the complainant have opposed the anticipatory bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for petitioners, note of the allegations levelled against the petitioners as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶21

Therefore, this bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioners Pawan S/o Shri Rajendra Singh and Jitendra S/o Shri Ummed Singh in the aforesaid FIR, they shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the SHO/IO of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:

¶22

i) That the petitioner/s shall make himself/herself/themselves available for interrogation before the police officer, as and when required;

¶23

ii) That the petitioner/s shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade him/her/them

¶24

(3 of 3)

¶25

[CRLMB-15903/2021]

¶26

from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;

¶27

iii) That the petitioner/s shall not leave India without previous permission of the court;

¶28

iv) That the petitioner/s shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she/they is/are accused or suspected.

¶29

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶30

Ritu/50

Pawan S/O Shri Rajendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan S/O Shri Rajendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar Son of Laxminarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Daulat Singh S/O Barath Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhal Singh S/O Shri Ghoturam Vs State of Rajasthan

Kailashchand S/O Kajodi Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ajharudeen Saiyad S/O Mohammad Husain Vs State of Rajasthan

Hemant Kumar S/O Shri Birbal Vs State of Rajasthan