Allowed

Hansraj Son of Shyokishan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Nov 2021CRLMB/16569/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail application filed by accused petitioner Hansraj under Section 439 Cr.P.C. He was accused of offences under FIR No.550/2020 and co-accused had been granted bail. Court directed release on personal bond with two sureties to trial court.

What did the court decide?

Release of accused petitioner Hansraj on bail by furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each.

Hansraj Son of Shyokishan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16569/2021

¶3

Hansraj Son Of Shyokishan, Resident Of Morbhatiyan, Police Station Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Tonk)

¶4

----Accused-Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam and Mr. Om Prakash Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

16/11/2021

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No.550/2020 was registered at P.S. Todarai Singh, District Tonk for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner was arrested. Thereafter, he moved the bail application before the trial court, which vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence, this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as he has nothing to do with the alleged incident. Learned counsel submits that co-accused persons namely, Sheokishan and Mukesh have been granted benefit of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-16569/2021]

¶17

Court vide order dated 01.04.2021 and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable to that of the co-accused persons. Counsel further submits that the accused petitioner is behind bars since 23.09.2021. Conclusion of the trial may likely take time. Hence the accused petitioner be released on bail.

¶18

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for accused petitioner, note of the allegations levelled against the petitioner as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Hansraj Son Of Shyokishan shall be released on bail in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶22

Ritu/18

Hansraj Son of Shyokishan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hansraj Son of Shyokishan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghuveer Singh S/O Gopal Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Radheyshyam S/O Gokul Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Sadam Khan S/O Imammudin Vs State of Rajasthan

Kartar Singh Son of Shri Mahavir Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Pramod Kumar S/O Rampratap Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilip S/O Bhojraj Vs State of Rajasthan