Allowed

Narendra Singh S/O Shri Gokul Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC29 Nov 2021CRLMB/15098/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The petitioner, alleged to be falsely implicated in an excise case, was directed to furnish a personal bond and two sureties on specific conditions including availability for interrogation and not leaving India without permission.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed. Directed to release petitioner on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each subject to standard conditions.

Narendra Singh S/O Shri Gokul Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15098/2021

¶3

Narendra Singh S/o Shri Gokul Singh, R/o Vill. Ballu Singh Ka Bas Ps Rajgarh Dist. Alwar Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶10

Order

¶11

29/11/2021

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.09/2020-2021 registered at Police Station Excise Rajgarh, Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 16/54, 19/54, 54 (D) of Rajasthan Excise Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has joined the investigation as per direction of this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that petitioner has given the alleged shop to Ajay Kumar Sain by way of rent note. Nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner and conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-15098/2021]

¶18

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶19

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Excise Rajgarh, Alwar in F.I.R. No.09/2020-2021 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Narendra Singh S/o Shri Gokul Singh , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶20

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶21

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶22

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶23

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶24

Jatin /195

Narendra Singh S/O Shri Gokul Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narendra Singh S/O Shri Gokul Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Banwari Kewat S/O Ram Kalyan Vs State of Rajasthan

Yogesh @ Bablu S/O Naharsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kundan Singh S/O Shri Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan

Damodar Sharma S/O Shri Bhanwar Lal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Irshad S/O Shri Nizammuddeen Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohan Singh Rathore S/O Shri Pahad Singh Vs State of Rajasthan