Allowed

Bajranga @ Bajranglal S/O Ramnath v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Nov 2021CRLMB/14647/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application filed by the petitioner who is accused of a crime. The petitioner, who is the father-in-law of the prosecutrix in a matrimonial dispute involving rape allegations, was granted bail on personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be enlarged on bail to furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000/- each.

Bajranga @ Bajranglal S/O Ramnath Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR WASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14647/2021

¶3

Bajranga @ BaJranglal S/o Ramnath, R/o Bhimpura Mataji Ps ~igod Kota Rural Raj. Presently He Is In J.C. In Central Jail Kota

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of Rajasthan, Through pp

¶6

For Petitioner[s)*'s : Mr. Pradeep Mathur "4 ytB 0
-%.c
\ ... :?-
'r Jain L
B
For ~espomd&nt(s) : Mr. Chandragupt choprat $p8>$
,% '~7- 4
'"4, 'A
T

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE::N& ENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
,;f);g-A 'Lu7
.-. ..<t"> "A*+ . . .,:-erg
(.;'"' ' !?d-,;:#3,q-:-- f .;2&+ 4'
..m.,l ,AOE~ e @>t,hL +
J4 J+><~r:~~~~~fj~~ 8%
Ljp< 'L'?.?J 3 ?%:%& '%+e4 j 25. 3, v+,:?&)i;;y;+? br++ .!,y &': Jw $$#I
10/11/2021 30 33 .,* y>;?;\k.Q* .,,?.,ljQ= ,, G{: & . :
La .,.i,> .& k ** -: t, L 8,: y,-?, r; flw\r-y,,$-,
The present bail applca$i~~has$b,e@filed -,. . , . 3 JI et under Section 439
f-,kfc<s) / p+>>.~$>$.f,Qj
'"E.'.?ij;f~pj'., o&.).jS <.,

¶8

Cr.P.C. with FIR Kota (Rural) for the ~0.77/~021 registered at

¶9

ofience(s) under

¶10

is behind the bars *\ "\ Cjr&, --SGaw> %eGp7wim f@s I? 4hpipetitioner 4t . also submits since 26.7.2021. ~earneqpdp,nFJ 'S . that petitioner is father-in-law of the prosecutrix. Due to matriomjnal dispute, present FIR was lodged against him. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that allegation of rape is not levelled against the petitioner in the FIR. Later on, prosecutrix has improved her version Charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner and conclusion of trial may take long time. Hence, the petitioner be enlarged on bail.

¶11

I I I

¶12

[CRLMB- 14647/2021I

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

earned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶16

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is t;. 4 % h\ IL-F (,rY allowed and it is qndere~-$hat the acsus.gdl etitioner Bajranga 6 <.-". \ Ti+ ' 2, ir 5 $0 -. ~ajranglal,~~o%~arnnath shall be enlarged cjh pyl provided he \ .- pi5@ L =.- /' furnishe2,fal"@ersonal bond in the sum of ~~.50,0$0/&with L A two ,V--d 3 /.a sureties zf Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the legrned trial led on all the Judge for dates of h

¶17

DHAD DHA),J

¶18

Brijesh 39.

Bajranga @ Bajranglal S/O Ramnath v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bajranga @ Bajranglal S/O Ramnath v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harinarayan Meena S/O Sh. Ram Kaliyanji Vs State of Rajasthan

Harinarayan Meena S/O Sh. Ram Kaliyanji Vs State of Rajasthan

Harinarayan Meena S/O Sh. Ram Kaliyanji Vs State of Rajasthan

Dauji S/O Baljeet Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vikram @ Galla S/O Umrav Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rohit Verma S/O Shri Basant Verma Vs State of Rajasthan