Arpit v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Jodhpur allowed bail to the petitioner charged with offences under Section 302 IPC and Arms Act, directing him to furnish a bond with two sureties, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail on bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.
What the court decided
(1 of 2)
[CRLMB-10434/2020]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No. 10434/2020
Arpit S/o Shri Rakesh Kumar, Aged About 26 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Panchkosi, Police Station Sarwar Khuiyan, District Fajilka (Punjab). (In Judicial Custody At Central Jail Jodhpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through P.p.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.S. Choudhary, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Pradeep Choudhary. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mohd. Javed Gouri, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
10/03/2021
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application of the accused charged with murder and using arms deserves to be accepted without expressing opinion on merits.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arpit S/o Shri Rakesh Kumar
- respondent
State
Coram
ARUN BHANSALI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/10434/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court