Allowed

Balveer S/O Sultan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Jul 2021CRLMB/10353/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner, a government employee, considering that a compromise had arrived at between the parties regarding the offences mentioned in the FIR.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; petitioner to execute personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each on specified conditions.

Balveer S/O Sultan Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶3

10353/2021

¶4

Balveer S/o Sultan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Chokidaro Ki Dhani, Tan Hudla, P.s. Mahwa, District Dausa (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena present in the Court For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

23/07/2021

¶13

Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.

¶14

F.I.R. No.863/2020 was registered at Police Station, Mahwa (Dausa) for offence under Sections 143, 323, 341 & 427 I.P.C.

¶15

It is contended by the counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is a government employee. A compromise has arrived at between the parties.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

I have considered the contentions.

¶18

Considering the contention put forth by counsel for the petitioner, the anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶19

The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CRLMB-10353/2021]

¶22

S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Mahwa (Dausa) in F.I.R. No. 863/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:-

¶23

(I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶24

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and

¶25

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.

¶26

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶27

ARTI SHARMA /39

Balveer S/O Sultan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balveer S/O Sultan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madanlal Son of Shri Danmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Juned Alam S/O Shri Mohammed Habibul Rahman Vs State of Rajasthan

Sushil S/O Shri Ramkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramphool S/O Samnata Vs the State of Rajasthan

Premchand S/O Shri Mathuralal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ratan Lal Choudhary Son of Surajbhan Choudhary Vs the State of Rajasthan