The petitioner's cross application for extension of interim bail was dismissed because it was not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Appli No. 326/2021
Devi Lal S/o Shri Amar Chand, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Sabalpura, Kareda Police Station, District Bhilwara.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Khilery For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudhir Tak, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
06/10/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. application filed by the petitioner for extension of time in interim bail granted by this Court vide order dated 04.08.2021.
Accordingly and in view of above submissions, the misc. application preferred by the petitioner is dismissed as not pressed.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA), J
389-amit/-
Devi Lal
State Of Rajasthan
Deendayal Kachhawaha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
