Dismissed
Punam v. State
Rajasthan HCCRLBC/22/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Court dismissed bail cancellation application as infructuous following the death of respondent No.2 amidst COVID-19 restrictions.
What did the court decide?
Bail cancellation application dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶2
S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 22/2020
¶3
Punam D/o Shri Nandlal Agarwal W/o Shri Murarilal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Nohar, At Present Aabad Nethrana, Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).
¶4
----Petitioner
¶5
Versus
¶6
- State, Through P.p.
¶7
- Murari Lal S/o Rajkumar, By Caste Agarwal, R/o Behind Matoria Garage, Nohar, Hanumangarh.
¶8
----Respondents
¶9
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. BhoopSingh Choudhary (on VC) |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP |
| Mr. Ram Kumar Bohra |
¶10
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
¶11
Order
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Punam D/o Shri Nandlal Agarwal
- respondent
State
- respondent
Murai Lal S/o Rajkumar
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLBC/22/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court