Balu v. Ejan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jodhpur, condoned the delay in filing an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and restored S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 217/2016 to its original number.
What did the court decide?
The delay was condoned and S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 217/2016 was restored to its original number.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 76/2019
Balu
----Petitioner
Versus
Ejan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. S. Chundawat. For Respondent(s) : Mr. R. K. Chotia for Dr. Sachin Acharya. Mr. Bhanwar Lal Patel for Mr. R. K. Acharya.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
19/08/2021
Heard learned counsel for the parties on application filed by the applicant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay in filing the restoration application.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the restoration application should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Balu
- respondent
Ejan
Coram
Arun Bhansali
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRES/76/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court