The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan allowed an application under Order XXI Rules 1 and 3 CPC seeking withdrawal of S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 229/2006 after the parties settled the dispute mutually.
Application for withdrawal of appeal allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; record sent back; court fees refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 229/2006
LRs of Late Shri Dilip Ram
both resident of 18 G.G., Govindpura, Tehsil & District Sri Ganganagar.
----Appellants
Versus
Sandeep Kumar son of Jagdish Chandra, resident of Govindpura (18 G.G.), Tehsil and District Sri Ganganagar.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Navneet Punia for Mr. Trilok Joshi. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailendra Gwala for Mr. Sunil Beniwal.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
18/08/2021
An application has been filed by the appellants under Order XXIII, Rule 1 & 3 CPC seeking withdrawal of the appeal as parties have settled the dispute mutually.
In view of the submissions made in the application, the same is allowed. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
The record of the trial court be sent back immediately.
The court fees paid by the appellants is ordered to be refunded back to the appellants.
(2 of 2)
[CFA-229/2006]
A certificate in this regard be issued by the Registry to the appellants / counsel for the appellants.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
19-Rmathur/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed to be withdrawn by the parties.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Surendra Kumar
Mahaveer Singh
Vidhya Devi
Nirmla
Sandeep Kumar
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
